|







 |
|
News on
Horse Slaughter
Please look at the
statistics below, particularly the export figures.
The ONLY way to end this
is through passage of the federal bills.
|
2008 Slaughter Statistics
Total U.S. Horses slaughtered
week ending 4/26/08
(includes U.S., exported
to Mexico, exported to Canada)
As of 5/1/08
the statistics service will be
discontinued on this site. For
current statistics visit
Statistics from USDA |
|
|
2007 Horses exported to
Mexico from U.S.
for slaughter
Statistics from USDA
Note the
substantial increase over previous year
**NOTE: There were
ZERO horses exported to Mexico for slaughter
during the last week of 2007 |
2007 Horses exported to
Canada from U.S.
for immediate slaughter
Statistics from Canadian government
through end of 09/07
Note the
substantial increase over previous year |
|
2007 Year End Statistics
45,609 |
2006 Year End
Statistics
11,080 |
2007 Year to Date
(01/07 - end of 09/07)
36,401 |
2006 Year to Date
(01/06 - end of 09/06)
18,373 |
Let's bring ALL of these numbers to ZERO. |
Easy
Contact Tool
|
| Help Senator Mary Landrieu move the federal
bills forward:
TAKE ACTION |
|
|
2007 Year
End Summary for Slaughter Statistics
| 2007 Totals
- All U.S. Horses for Slaughter - 111,771 + * |
2006-
All U.S. Horses for Slaughter - 135,288 + * |
|
U.S. |
29,761 |
U.S. |
105,835 |
|
Exported to Mexico for Slaughter
|
45,609 |
Exported to Mexico for
Slaughter |
11,080 |
| *Exported to Canada for
Slaughter |
36,401 + |
*Exported to Canada for
Slaughter |
18,373 + |
|
*Canadian figures through September 2007 - full
figures will be posted upon receipt |
*Canadian figures through
September 2006 - full figures will be posted upon receipt |
In summary, 2007 seemed to bring an overall decrease in
the number of U.S. horses which were destined for slaughter. Due to
the closure of the Texas facilities early in the year, domestic numbers
dropped, with only Cavel in Illinois remaining open. Legislation in
Illinois to stop horse slaughter within the state brought a cycle of
on and off again production while the appeals courts ruled one way, then
another, on the legalities. The U.S. closures saw an increase of the
export of horses to Mexico for slaughter up 4 times over the 2006 figures.
Canada is somewhat farther behind in the accounting, since the USDA claims
not to hold those figures, as it does for Mexico. As soon as the
Canadian end of year figures are received, the totals will be finalized.
At this point, it appears that the exports to Canada have approximately
doubled from 2006 to 2007. Detailed breakdowns on the weekly figures
are available on the Slaughter Statistics
page. |
|
2007 News items can be found
in the
Archives
(there is also a
hold over on this page if the item has significant and recent
relevance to pending actions for 2008) |
|
McCullough Peaks Horse Herd in Danger
The Bureau of Land Management has scheduled another
removal of wild horses from Montana. Information from
The
Cloud Foundation and the action that you can take to prevent the
destruction of our native herds.
Does anyone recall that we have a
federal bill H.R. 249
which has been allowed to be swept under the rug after early
passage in the House in April of 2007 ? Was it
passed with a wink and a nod that this action would placate the restless
natives until it drifted into obscurity, becoming null and void with
the end of 2008?
-
4/26/2007:
-
Received in the Senate and Read
twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources.
This bill
would prevent the slaughter of our wild horses.
|
|
6/19/08: It is very
interesting that the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer
Protection, spearheaded by Rep. Jan Schakowsky (IL) and Ed Whitfield (KY)
finds the time to enter into a completely new side trip in pursuit of
"Breeding, Drugs, and Breakdowns: The State of Thoroughbred Horseracing and
the Welfare of the Thoroughbred Racehorse," while pending legislation
for the American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act continues to go nowhere.
Perhaps if the energy expended here were redirected in a more efficient
direction we might get these laws passed during this session of Congress.
Perhaps, while well intentioned, this state of horse racing is better
left to those who are acquainted with the topic. It should not be
overlooked that the industry continues to go forward in making conditions
safer for the Thoroughbred race horse (for addition information:
Lighthouse), a fact that seems to be
conveniently overlooked by both sides of the fence. It is a shame and
a travesty that our Congress cannot keep on course for bills which are
allowed to be swept under the rug while they pursue new ways to occupy the
short time remaining.
|
|
6/16/08
The U.S. Supreme Court
denies Cavel's challenge of the Illinois law prohibiting
horse slaughter.
|
|
The Day No Horses Went to Slaughter
- article details the incredible save of 163 horses from the Sugarcreek
Auction on Memorial Day, 2008.
|
*** ACTION NEEDED ON S. 311, THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT ***
HERE IS WHAT WE NEED TO DO RIGHT NOW BEFORE THE 110th
CONGRESSIONAL SESSION ENDS THE LAST QUARTER of 2008
(please note: this information is the most up-to-date and the
following action items will be the essence of any effort this
year to pass the AHSPA. Please take the time to make these
calls, send emails and faxes. It is extremely important for our
fight against the suffering of our horses to take the below
actions)
1. CONTACT SENATOR HARRY REID (NV, Dem) - Senate Majority Leader
Capitol Address: 528 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC
205100001
Ph: (202) 224-3542 /
Fax: (202) 224-7327
District Address: Lloyd D. George Federal Building
333 Las Vegas
Boulevard South, Ste. 8016
Las Vegas, NV
891017075
Ph: (702) 388-5020 /
Fax: (702) 388-5030
Why:
S. 311 has passed Senate committee and is awaiting floor vote.
This means that if the bill is brought to the floor for a vote
and we have the majority of senators to support it, we have a
very good chance of passing S. 311 in Senate. The House will
then have to mirror this. The House has voted favorably on
HR. 503 (the sister bill in the House) several times. Now they
are in a way waiting for their Senate counterparts to hold their
end. Harry Reid alone
is currently in a position to bring the bill to the floor for a
vote without any additional Senate actions! This will
effectively give our horses the chance they so desperately
need. URGENT: ASK SENATOR REID TO BRING S.311 TO THE FLOOR FOR
A VOTE!
2. CONTACT SENATOR MITCH MCCONNELL (KY, Rep) - Senate Minority
Leader
Capitol Address: 361-A Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC
205100001
Ph: (202) 224-2541 /
Fax: (202) 224-2499
District Address: 601 West Broadway Suite 630
Louisville, KY
402022238
Ph: (502) 582-6304
/Fax: (502) 582-5326
Why:
Support from both Senate leaders would be of immeasurable
importance to us. In addition, the endorsement of both Senate
leaders would mean representation in both political parties
which can in turn help ensure additional Senator votes and send
a message that this issue spans political borders on a very high
legislative level.
URGENT: ASK SENATOR MCCONNEL TO SUPPORT S.311 AND HELP BRING IT
TO THE FLOOR FOR A VOTE!
3. CALL YOUR SENATORS TO BUILD OUR S. 311 COSPONSOR LIST
Thank them if they're a cosponsor of S. 311 or, if they
are not, urgently request that they become a cosponsor of S.
311.
This is the list of S.311 cosponsors at the moment:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:SN00311:@@@P
This is how to contact your senators:
https://community.hsus.org/humane/leg-lookup/search.html
Why:
when S. 311 is brought to the floor for a vote, we need the 60
cosponsors to pass the AHSPA in Senate; more cosponsors of the
bill in Senate will send a strong message to the pro-slaughter
showing strong legislative support for outlawing horse
slaughter.
We need to do this now. This Congress will adjourn some time
between September and December of 2008.
|
|
|
In the
aftermath of HBO Real Sports' segment...
While the segment
must be commended in familiarizing the viewer with the horrors of horse
slaughter, as expected, it was another weapon in the arsenal to
sensationalize the ongoing love/hate relationship with horse racing in this
country. Perhaps it might have been helpful to offer up the
information that the majority of U.S. horses that go to slaughter do not
originate from the tracks. Irresponsible owners and trainers are
certainly not given a pass on this, as it is very real and many
Thoroughbreds and Standardbreds are discarded by people who have no priority
other than that dictated by the dollar. Certainly, the majority of
circumstances at the tracks are not dictated by the price of flesh on the
hoof and it is both a disservice to the viewer and to the industry in
general to paint it with such a single colored stroke.
When "Old Buck"
from John Doe's ranch makes the journey to the kill pen headlines are not
made. The reality is that there are more "Old Bucks" out there every
day which are loaded onto trailers for the final journey to the slaughter
house. No one mourns their loss. No one notices. Because
they are not a recognizable name, are they any less important? Is John
Doe any less guilty than the Thoroughbred trainer or owner that sends that
horse to the same fate? If you can't answer "no" to those questions,
then perhaps your agenda has become unfocused.
The meat industry
continues to flood the press with articles attempting to insinuate and
instill in the voting public the idea that the return of horse slaughter in
the U.S. is the only solution. Why send their "on the hoof" profits to
other shores when they can cash in on the cruelty here? The following
article, although another spin sent out by the underpinnings of the meat
industry, demonstrates the echoing hue and cry that the slaughter of horses
is a good thing. Rather than focusing on horse racing, this one takes
it down to the roots of our cowboy romance.
Horses abandoned in West as feed prices rise, by Laura Zuckerman, from
Yahoo News.
I believe that HBO
left out a very important aspect of the topic. It may have been more
helpful to give the viewer all of the information but, then again, that
probably doesn't offer the higher ratings and would place the focus on the
topic rather than on the sport. Who profits here? HBO Real
Sports, yes. Horses, remains to be seen.
One last question:
Thoroughbred, Paint, Quarter Horse, Mustang, Draft Horse, Mixed Breed - Are
any less important? The clock of the 110th Congress is ticking.
Senators and
Representatives are elected to office by the voters. You are the
voter. The next time that you make contact to ask for forward movement
and passage of the American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act (H.R. 503, S.
311, AND H.R. 249), remember that every vote counts. Responsibility
must be accounted for. No action on the part of your legislator = no
vote when it is time for re-election. The
CONTACT LAWMAKERS box is at the top of this page.
|
|
HBO Real Sports - Monday,
May 12 10:00 p.m. EST/PST (check listings for time in your area):
Hidden Horses
Segment featuring
horse slaughter. The promo on the HBO site seems to target the
Thoroughbred industry.
I've seen some
of the segments that Real Sports has done in the past in
relationship to horse racing. Some are good, some are not, some
have a definite sensationalized slant. From the description on
HBO's site, this does seem to target the Thoroughbred industry. I
am hoping that the facts are accurate, not sensationalized, and it
is done in a way that doesn't point the finger at racing as the sole
problem. The Quarter Horse industry is a far greater problem in
horses destined for slaughter, although they do not stand alone, as
the pockets of irresponsibility are widespread. Awareness is
certainly needed, if we are to solve the problem. Finger pointing
is not the answer, action is the answer, and we all need to ask
ourselves the question, "What can I do to help?" After that, we
need to get out there and do it.
The past week,
in the aftermath of the tragic breakdown of Eight Belles, has
brought out the best and the worst in people. Accusations have
flown at the connections of the filly by groups that are such casual
observers that they do not have the necessary information to pass
judgment. There is no owner, no trainer, no jockey that sends
a horse out with the intention of injury. Jockeys do not
frivolously continue to run a horse with a suspected problem for the
simple fact that when the horse goes down, they go with it, risking
catastrophic injury for not only the horse, but themselves as well.
The Thoroughbred industry is working with ever increasing effort to
make conditions safer for horses.
On a daily
basis, I hear a lot of "they should, you should" but see little
action on the part of the accusers themselves beyond the pointing
fingers. There are only so many letters and phone calls that
can be made with nothing offered beyond criticism. Have they
made a difference? In some cases, yes. In many
cases, not in the long run. Perhaps a constructive alternative
would be to, next time, rather than banding together with the
accusations, pick up the phone, type that email, but address it to
the organization or individual that is the focus of the discussion.
Ask one question, "What can I do to help?" Sign your name.
|
|
Texas
Attorney General rules that horse meat may not be shipped through the state
en route to foreign destinations
This does not mean that horses may
not be shipped through Texas on the way to Mexican slaughterhouses. It
means that horsemeat destined for human consumption may not transported
through the state, thus cannot be shipped out
of Texas, as has been previously done by the Mexican plants as a cost
saving measure. |
|
|
Status of American Horse
Slaughter Prevention Act, as of 4/18/08
These bills need
more than well intentioned lip service, as the clock is ticking
on the calendar for the 110th Congress which ends in 2008.
The numbers are rising for horses being exported for slaughter
and the pro-slaughter advocates are far more vocal than ever in
attempting to protect their financial positions.
H.R. 503
(in the House of Representatives)
-
Latest
Major Action: 3/2/2007
- Referred to the
subcommittee on
Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry, within
the Agriculture Committee (where
it remains one year later in 4/2008) Co-sponsors
continue to come onboard but it is largely inactive.
S. 311 (in the
Senate)
H.R. 249
(to prevent the slaughter of our wild horses - does anyone
remember that one?????)
-
Latest Major Action
:
4/26/2007 - Received in the Senate
and Read twice and referred to the
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
(where it remains one
year later in 4/2008) *Although this bill
was passed in the House, the above committee's
pro-slaughter politicians have been allowed to turn
it into the forgotten child. This bill
has been so secreted away that
Country singers team up to preserve wild horse herd
in Nevada in an effort to prevent 1200 horses
from being rounded up for "eventual livestock
sales."
|
|
|
Representative Dan Boren (D - OK) expresses his personal preference for
horse slaughter, the killing of polar bears, and just
about any other live creature that you would care to aim a gun or captive
bolt at. Citing the usual diatribe with the trite terminology of
"harvesting, activist groups" ad nauseum, he is doing his job as mouthpiece
for the frightened cattle industry constituents and campaigning for their
continued support. I'll bet that there are other citizens in Oklahoma
who do not share his beliefs. |
|
Conrad Burns, long time proponent of horse slaughter, assumes position with
lobbying firm Gage LLC to represent AQHA.
Joining the former Senator is former staffer Ryan Thomas. Burns is
well remembered for his efforts on behalf of continuing the slaughter of
wild horses and subverting the American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act by
tactics such as secret holds. He lost his Senate seat in January 2007,
after going down in defeat. Former Senate members are not allowed to
lobby for one year following leaving office. He became eligible to
lobby in February 2008.
|
|
Sign
on to become a citizen co-sponsor for the American Horse Slaughter
Prevention Act.
|
|
In Michigan,
Dr. Jack Kevorkian says that he will run for Congress as
an independent candidate. His opponant, from the Republican party
would be
Joseph
Knollenberg who voted NOE to H.R. 503 in 2006 and is pro-slaughter.
I wonder what Kevorkian's stand would be???
|
|
Remember this
name: Representative Jim Sacia, R-Pecatonica, IL
Citing the same
absurd reasoning as set forth by the slaughter advocates (blah, blah,
blah, ad nauseum), Rep. Sacia
attempts
to reintroduce horse slaughter in the state of Illinois and is soundly
defeated in the House committee. He plans on "trying again next year."
And while we
are on the subject, this is for you, all of the devoted Pro Slaughter
Advocates who enjoy reading the information on this site, and like nothing
better than to share your "insights": A graphic demonstration of
what you profess to be humane, in an
Investigation at Natural
Valley Horse Slaughter Plant.
|
|
From WJZ,
Baltimore
Americans Against
Horse Slaughter convene in Washington D.C. on March 4 and 5 and lobby to put
an end to horse slaughter, and transport for slaughter, within the U.S.
Meeting with government representatives, the goal is to bring the federal
laws to the floor of Congress before the end of this session.
|
|
Update 2/27/08
Bison Advocate Closes Trap; Forcibly Removed & Arrested
It is interesting
to note that although the government's official reason for removal and
slaughter of Bison is the fear of brucellosis being spread to cattle, there
has been no testing for brucellosis conducted on the slaughtered animals.
2/25/08
Citizen Takes Action to Shut Down Bison Trap
It's a familiar story. When no
one listens, other options sometimes become necessary. After miles of
frustration against a deaf government, man erects a platform and takes up
residence attached to the Horse Butte bison trap. Do you recall H.R.
249 to protect our wild horses? Passed in the House in 2007 it has
been conveniently swept under the rug and has yet to see the light of day on
the floor of the Senate. Is this becoming all too familiar?
|
"According to a
statement made by the man occupying the platform, "Until bison
management in Montana is guided by sound science and fiscal
responsibility with input from every interested party, I choose
this stance. In the past few years I have tried every
conceivable method of redress. I have written, I have called,
and I have gotten absolutely no response. I have nothing left
but to put my own life and freedom on the line. The bison are
that important." |
Will it only be
after every acre in America is occupied with something other than our
native species that we wake up and refuse to sit back and let our lives
be dictated by moneyed interests? It might be interesting to note
that protection of our wild horses and bison go hand in hand and have a
common thread by the opposition of the cattle industry.
Learn more at the
Buffalo Field Campaign.
|
|
2/22/08
A brief Amicus
Curiae (.pdf file) has
been filed by the Livestock Marketing Association in support of Cavel
International. The brief challenges the constitutionality of the
Illinois legislation and is an effort to be heard by the Supreme Court.
|
|
Illinois' Bill to Ban Double Decker Transport
of Horses Moves to the Floor. |
|
|
|
The Humane Scorecard
Let's take a look
at the Presidential hopefuls and their actions before the Primary
year when things weren't so geared toward getting your vote. When
under a little less scrutiny in the public eye,
The Humane Scorecard
(. pdf file will open in new window) gives the tally for each member of the
109th Congress and their respective scoring in animal welfare issues.
Of the remaining candidates, both Democrat and Republican, the totals were
as follow (in alphabetical order) if they were a member of the House or
Senate during that session of Congress:
|
Clinton |
100+ |
|
Huckabee |
N/A |
|
McCain |
4o |
|
Obama |
60 |
|
Paul |
14 |
|
Romney |
N/A |
Whether through revelations or gathering up the votes,
some of the candidates have currently improved their stand on animal
issues. A current overview, information on all of the current
contenders, and a bit of the usual lively debate, can be found in
Which Presidential Candidates are Animal Friendly? from
Seattlepi.com. Keep in mind that this article is an opinion
piece, although some additional and current facts are revealed.
Only one of these contenders was given the opportunity to
to vote on H.R. 249 in the 110th Congress. It was Ron Paul.
He voted NO.
In the 109th Congress, co-sponsors of S. 1915 (previous
version of S. 311 in the Senate) were Clinton and McCain. Neither
Obama or Paul were co-sponsors of the bill. You may recall the
incident of
Romney driving with the family to vacation with this crated Irish Setter
strapped to the top of the vehicle and the ensuing incidents.
You may also recall the not too far removed remarks of
Huckabee regarding eating and enjoying horsemeat.
There are far more issues that should determine your
choice for a candidate. You do owe it to yourself, and to your
nation, to be informed.
|
Do the Presidential
Candidates currently have pets? |
Read more on each
candidate at
Animals & Politics |
|
Clinton |
Yes |
|
Huckabee |
Yes |
|
McCain |
Yes |
|
Obama |
No |
|
Paul |
? - No
info available |
|
Romney |
No |
|
|
|
|
Don't think for a minute that they have given up
in South Dakota.
Horse-slaughter bill outcry keeps it alive from the Rapid City Journal
outlines the possibilities of a resurrections of the bill to encourage the
construction of a horse slaughter facility within the state. |
|
Senate Bill No. 170 shot down in South Dakota
The bill died in
committee following the barrage of phone calls, faxes, and emails.
Although this does not prevent a similar situation rearing its ugly head,
you did good! Now go to Washington and demand action on H.R. 503, S.
311, and H.R. 249! |
|
IMPORTANT ACTION -
South Dakota
Senate Bill No. 170 introduced in the South Dakota Legislature would
authorize $1 million loan for the construction of "equine processing
facility" within the state of South Dakota and is
scheduled for hearing
in the South Dakota Senate Agriculture
Committee at 10 a.m. Tuesday,
January 29, 2008. The bill was introduced by:
SD Senators -
Kloucek, Garnos, Gary Hanson, Koetzle, Maher, Sutton
SD
Representatives - DeVries, Elliott, Howie, Lucas, Betty Olson, Van
Norman
It is important to
note that South Dakota has been extremely pro slaughter. The possibilities
for parent companies
Velda - Zele, Belgium (Cavel-IL),
Chevideco - Rekkem, Belgium (Dallas
Crown - TX), Frontier
Meats - Fort Worth, TX (Beltex),
as well as outside interests, constructing facilities in a
state that would not be problematic with anti-slaughter legislation is very
high and financially advantageous.
What can you
do? Animal Welfare Institute
eAlert provides specific actions and contact information.
Until the federal legislation is passed, there is nothing preventing this
action in the state of South Dakota and it would not be expected that
countering legislation could be attained in the state.
|
|
Keep your
friends close and your enemies closer
That's an
interesting concept, and one with some merit, but not really the subject of
this diatribe. However, a good treatise on the concept can be found on
AskMen.com and is worth the read. Now, moving on...
In the days
leading up to the apex of a decision in the 110th Congress on whether we
will or will not end horse slaughter in the U.S., it seems as though the
public information currently being disseminated is more poignant than ever.
Both sides are running short on patience and getting more desperate in their
attempts to inform and promote their stand on the issue. Just as we
may preach to our own choir regarding the inhumanity of horse slaughter, so
does the meat industry take the opposing view. They take this very
seriously, as it is just one determiner of their financial viability.
Money is the bottom line and not their concern about the humane treatment of
any animal headed for slaughter. If humane treatment were their
motive, they would all jump the fence to this side. Logical and
simple.
When I read an
article that quotes a poultry industry official accusing anti slaughter
groups of "publicizing sensational and frequently fabricated and
manipulated images," of the inhumane slaughter of animals, it boggles
the mind. Unfortunately, it is not necessary to manipulate any images
or fabricate any stories regarding the practices. The treatment of
horse bound for slaughter is very much real. Factory farming is very
much real. Dr. Simon Shane reports from WATT Poultry USA in
|
|
Susan Wagner, of
Equine Advocates,
was a recent guest on
The Martha Stewart
Show. She spoke eloquently and knowledgeably about the issue of
horse slaughter in the U.S. and the importance of passage of the federal
bills to end the slaughter and transport for slaughter. A special
thank you to Susan and to Martha Stewart for providing the accessibility to
many in the viewing audience who may not have been aware.
From
YouTube, Equine Advocates, the important segment from The Martha Stewart
Show which aired 1/16/08*:
*To run this file on your
computer, you must "allow" content to run by clicking in your browser bar.
If preferred, the YouTube video
may
also be accessed on the YouTube site.
|
|
Mark
January 22, 2008 on your calendar - Call in day for horses
Tuesday, January
22, 2008 has been designated as the next National Call-In Day for horses.
Let your voice be heard in support of ending slaughter in the U.S. Use
the Contact Lawmakers box above to find the direct
number for your representatives, or call the Capitol switchboard at (202)
224-3121 and ask for your (1) Representative and (2) Senators. Ask
them to co-sponsor H.R. 503 or S. 311 if they haven't already. Ask
them to prioritize the passage of the bills. |
|
Elections drawing closer every day - the
anti slaughter slant
Considering your
choice of candidate for the Presidential election should be a well thought
out and informed decision. While it should not be based soley on a
candidate's views of legislation to prevent the slaughter of horses and
other humane issues, it pays to be clear on the stand of each contender.
Animals
& Politics provides such information. Upon much review of records
accumulated on this topic, the front runners for each party would be:
Democrats - Hillary Rodham Clinton, Republicans - John McCain (both were
also 2006 co-sponsors when the bill was
S.R. 1915). It is
recalled that while both were front runners in co-sponsorship of the
anti-slaughter bills, Barack Obama took longer to commit. Not signing
on at all to the previous bill while in the 109th Congress, he initially
refused
to do so with the present legislation when directly asked for support. This, and Obama's support
of Judge Frederick Kapala, who kept slaughter alive in Illinois, seem just a
couple of reasons to deny him the nod.
From 6/1/07 -
found on Legislation-section,
Illinois:
|
|
1/9/08
Veterinarians for Equine Welfare issues white paper
report:
Horse Slaughter - Its Ethical Impact and Subsequent Response of the
Veterinary Profession in response to misinformation distributed as a
blanket statement purported to represent all veterinary professionals. |
|
Huckabee Likes
Horsemeat -- "tastes like chicken"
From the
Wall Street Journal 12/21/07: Mike Huckabee, campaigning in Iowa,
speaks to reporters from his bus.
| “It’s one of my favorite
places,” he said, perhaps pandering to the Dutch Iowan vote. He
named a couple of his favorite Dutch foods, including one made
from horsemeat. Asked if it tasted like chicken, he confirmed:
“Tastes like chicken.” |
|
|
Freedom of
Information Act - As a citizen of the U.S. it is
your right to obtain information, per written request, from federal
agencies.
Principal FOIA Contacts at Federal Agencies. One such agency is
the Department of Agriculture:
|
Department of Agriculture
Rita Morgan
Acting FOIA/PA Coordinator
Room 440AA, Whitten Building
Washington, D.C. 20250-1300
telephone number: (202) 720-8164 |
If you were, for
example, wondering why the U.S. government does not seem to have
statistics of horses exported to Canada for slaughter available, a more
detailed and specific list of contacts within the USDA are listed here:
Agency FOIA Contacts
I wonder if, perhaps, the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service would be the one to contact if you were
seeking this information or
reason why it was not available? If so, this agency officer may be
contacted by
mail, facsimile, e-mail, or web request form.:
|
|
12/12/07
Cavel back in the news
In a little piece tucked here and
there on the internet, Cavel attorney J. Philip Calabrese has indicated that
Cavel will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Illinois law closing the
slaughterhouse. Cavel has until 1/18/08 to file the petition. |
|
Confused
about double decker trailers transporting horses, even though you thought it
was illegal?
JAVMA News, in their December 15, 2007 article (yes, they date them
ahead if you read before that date and are wondering) offers an overview on
the current legislative efforts attempting to close the loopholes in the
intended law prohibiting the practice. Follow the instructions at
the bottom of the article to submit comments to USDA before January 7, 2008
regarding the rule. |
|
If the rising numbers of horses
exported across borders from the U.S. for slaughter does not seem
significant, the realities of the flagrant transport and humane violations
should. Read Animals' Angels USA
Investigation into the export of American horses to Mexico - External Report
(.pdf file), hosted by
Texas Horse Talk.
Further studies conducted by Animals Angels can be found on their
Horse Slaughter page. |
|
11/14/07
S. 311 has been placed on the Senate
Legislative Calendar, #488, under General Orders. What this
means is that at some point in the near or far future, the bill may make it
to the floor of the Senate, if that happens before the end of the 110th
Congress. |
|
11/11/07
A letter from Willie Nelson. Join together on Capitol Hill,
November 13 & 14 to demand a vote on H.R. 503 and S.311, The American Horse
Slaughter Prevention Act. |
|
11/7/07
Where are the federal bills for The
American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act?
-
H.R. 503 -
With 188 current cosponsors, H.R. 503 was referred on
3/2/07 to the House Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry, where
it remains hidden today.
-
S. 311 -
On 4/25/07 the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
ordered the bill to be reported favorable, without amendment. No
further action has been forthcoming.
-
H.R. 249 -
The bill to restore the prohibition on commercial sale
and slaughter of our wild horses and burros was passed in the House of
Representatives on 4/26/07. It was received in the Senate and
referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, where it
remains hidden today.
As it currently
appears, another year will pass without action on the bills. While
politicians continue to play the chess game with our federal legislation,
horses are being transported over borders in ever increasing numbers.
The committees that hold both H.R. 503 and H.R. 249 are largely
pro-slaughter. Out of sight, out of mind, in this current
administration. Have you contacted your representatives (again?), have
you demanded answers to why this inaction is allowed? |
|
10/3/07
Do you need a
quick review of the movement to end horse slaughter?
Racing and the Law, by Chris E. Wittstruck, Esq. provides an unbiased
and accurate overview of major events and the current status of U.S.
legislation. Article from
Harnesslink.com.
|
|